——e pepe ae Te ho we
Doran WING Vr imc inwavt
BOARD Snip CORRECTION OF NAVA RECORDS
714 & COURTHOLISE RI SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No .NRO4895-14
15 September 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: ASLAN A NTE
Ref: (a) Tattle: 10 U 600. 1552
Fnel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser g12/0254
of 13 Aug 2014
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that
the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he
received two award points toward his February 2012 Reserve Navy-
wide advancement examination and that he was advanced to
CM1/E-6.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10
September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
ive action indicated below should be taken on the
Documentary material considered by
ct
the correc
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
pb. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit
and warrants favorable ACtLem.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
Finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner is awarded two award points toward his
February 2012, E-6/CM1 Reserve Navy -wide advancement
examination, due to his deployment to Kuwait.
b. Petitioner was advanced to B-6/CM1 from the February
2012 Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination with an effective
date of 16 December 5012 and a Time in Rate date of 1 July 2012.
c. Petitioner ig authorized all back pay and allowances
from the effective date forward.
d. A copy of this Report of proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723,.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled ana jf!
/
Si Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
4
15 September 2014
ROBERT J. O' NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5122 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received two points for his Individual Augmentation (IA) from June 2011 to April 2012 for the September 2012 E-6 Navy-wide advancement examination. Docket No.NR05122-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all.the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10262 11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2012 and, pursuant to 4ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be teken on the available evidence of record. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. VOZ62-12 that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6859 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2} Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 8112/0254 - of 13 Aug 2014 i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR735 14
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to IT2/E-5 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10656 11
Under BUPERINST 1430.16F, (Advancement Manual for Enlisted Personnel of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Navy Reserve), all personnel designated in certain ratings, including Petitioner’s rating, “must maintain, as a minimum, continuous security clearance eligibility.” This provision has been interpreted by NPC to mean that, in order to be eligible to participate in an advancement cycle, take an advancement exam or advance to the next highest grade, a Sailor in one of the designated ratings must hold...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5391-13
Be DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NRO05391-13 16 September 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy el Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6791 14
gsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and {3}, the Docket No.NR6791-14 Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3145 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MN1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11272 11
g. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had never been held back in any way from progressing through his Navy career due to security clearance issues and he was not aware that there was a deficiency that would disqualify him from competing for advancement. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06079-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate her E-6/YN1 Navy-wide advancement examinations and show that that her E-6/YN1 examinations from September 2008 through September 2010 be validated and receive PNA points to be applied to her March 2011 exam. ...